Skip to content

Conversation

AnnaBobasheva
Copy link

@AnnaBobasheva AnnaBobasheva commented Jul 22, 2025

Adding four new examples for neighbors algorithm famuily. There are two copies of the same examples using different datasets "GinPoint" and "ChinaTown".

Being aware of the non-desirebility of the "GunPoint" dataset I still wouls like it to be consideredd because it illustrates the "neighbors" algorithm the best.

@charavelg
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for contributing!!!

Unfortunately, it seems that UCR UEA datasets are not currently available, hence the failing CI. Not sure why though.

@AnnaBobasheva
Copy link
Author

AnnaBobasheva commented Jul 22, 2025

Maybe the CI cannot access the outside sources? Are you using Inria's CI or GitHub's?

@charavelg
Copy link
Contributor

It's on azure pipelines but the problem should be fixed with #563 . I relaunched it. wait and see :)

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 25, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 90.09%. Comparing base (cd3ec24) to head (c17cc7b).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #561   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   90.09%   90.09%           
=======================================
  Files          67       67           
  Lines        6089     6089           
=======================================
  Hits         5486     5486           
  Misses        603      603           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@Copilot Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings August 19, 2025 16:00
Copy link

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants