Skip to content

Conversation

MasterPtato
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Sep 30, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
rivetkit-serverless Ready Ready Preview Comment Oct 1, 2025 4:42am

Copy link
Contributor Author

MasterPtato commented Sep 30, 2025

Warning

This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack on Graphite.
Learn more


How to use the Graphite Merge Queue

Add either label to this PR to merge it via the merge queue:

  • merge queue - adds this PR to the back of the merge queue
  • hotfix - for urgent hot fixes, skip the queue and merge this PR next

You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository.

Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue.

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

Copy link

claude bot commented Sep 30, 2025

Claude finished @MasterPtato's task —— View job


Code Review Complete ✅

Todo List:

  • Read repository guidelines (CLAUDE.md)
  • Analyze changed files for code quality
  • Check for potential bugs and issues
  • Review performance considerations
  • Assess security concerns
  • Evaluate test coverage needs
  • Provide comprehensive feedback

Review Summary

This PR implements support for reading the x-rivetkit-total-slots header in serverless mode, allowing dynamic configuration of slot capacity at runtime. The changes are well-structured and follow the existing codebase patterns.

🟢 Code Quality & Best Practices

Positive aspects:

  • Consistent parameter naming (totalSlots) across all components
  • Proper fallback handling with config.totalSlots as default
  • Follows existing patterns for header-based configuration (similar to x-rivet-token)
  • Type safety maintained with proper TypeScript annotations
  • Clean separation of concerns between client config, manager router, and actor driver

🟡 Minor Issues Found

  1. Type Coercion (Line 122 in router.ts):

    let totalSlots: number | undefined = parseInt(c.req.header("x-rivetkit-total-slots") as any);

    The as any cast is needed here because c.req.header() returns string | undefined, but it's not ideal. Consider:

    const totalSlotsHeader = c.req.header("x-rivetkit-total-slots");
    let totalSlots: number | undefined = totalSlotsHeader ? parseInt(totalSlotsHeader) : undefined;
  2. Input Validation:
    The code only checks for isNaN() but doesn't validate if the parsed number is positive or within reasonable bounds. Consider adding:

    if (isNaN(totalSlots) || totalSlots <= 0) totalSlots = undefined;

🟢 Security Considerations

  • No security concerns identified
  • Header-based input is properly parsed and validated
  • No sensitive data exposure risks
  • Follows existing security patterns used for token handling

🟢 Performance Considerations

  • Minimal performance impact
  • Header parsing is lightweight
  • parseInt() call is acceptable for this use case
  • No memory leaks or performance bottlenecks introduced

🟡 Test Coverage Recommendations

Missing test scenarios that should be added:

  1. Header parsing tests:

    • Valid numeric values
    • Invalid/non-numeric values
    • Missing header (undefined case)
    • Negative numbers
    • Zero values
    • Very large numbers
  2. Integration tests:

    • Serverless endpoint with x-rivetkit-total-slots header
    • Fallback to config value when header is missing
    • Override behavior when both header and config are present

🟢 Architecture & Design

The implementation properly follows the existing architecture:

  • ClientConfigRunConfigEngineActorDriver flow is maintained
  • Serverless-specific handling isolated in router
  • Consistent with existing token parameter handling

Recommendations

  1. Improve type safety in header parsing (see issue Test #1 above)
  2. Add input validation for reasonable slot limits
  3. Add comprehensive tests for the new functionality
  4. Consider documenting the new header in API documentation

Files & Lines Referenced

  • packages/rivetkit/src/client/config.ts:22 - New totalSlots field
  • packages/rivetkit/src/drivers/engine/actor-driver.ts:84,87 - Priority logic for token/totalSlots
  • packages/rivetkit/src/manager/router.ts:108,122-123 - Header parsing and function signature update
  • packages/rivetkit/src/registry/mod.ts:218,220-221 - Serverless builder function update

Overall, this is a solid implementation that extends the existing patterns appropriately. The minor issues identified are easily addressable and don't block the functionality.


Copy link

pkg-pr-new bot commented Sep 30, 2025

More templates

@rivetkit/actor

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivetkit/@rivetkit/actor@1319

@rivetkit/cloudflare-workers

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivetkit/@rivetkit/cloudflare-workers@1319

@rivetkit/core

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivetkit/@rivetkit/core@1319

@rivetkit/db

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivetkit/@rivetkit/db@1319

@rivetkit/framework-base

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivetkit/@rivetkit/framework-base@1319

@rivetkit/next-js

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivetkit/@rivetkit/next-js@1319

@rivetkit/react

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivetkit/@rivetkit/react@1319

rivetkit

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivetkit@1319

@rivetkit/sql-loader

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivetkit/@rivetkit/sql-loader@1319

commit: 128cee0

Copy link

graphite-app bot commented Oct 1, 2025

Merge activity

  • Oct 1, 4:30 AM UTC: NathanFlurry added this pull request to the Graphite merge queue.
  • Oct 1, 4:31 AM UTC: The Graphite merge queue removed this pull request due to downstack failures on PR #1316.
  • Oct 1, 4:31 AM UTC: The Graphite merge queue removed this pull request due to downstack failures on PR #1316.
  • Oct 1, 4:40 AM UTC: NathanFlurry added this pull request to the Graphite merge queue.
  • Oct 1, 4:40 AM UTC: CI is running for this pull request on a draft pull request (#1322) due to your merge queue CI optimization settings.
  • Oct 1, 4:41 AM UTC: Merged by the Graphite merge queue via draft PR: #1322.

@NathanFlurry NathanFlurry force-pushed the 09-30-feat_read_total_slots_header_for_serverless branch from 128cee0 to 5650abe Compare October 1, 2025 04:39
@NathanFlurry NathanFlurry force-pushed the 09-30-fix_make_serverless_use_bare branch from de19ac5 to 6d1f0f5 Compare October 1, 2025 04:39
Copy link

claude bot commented Oct 1, 2025

Claude finished @MasterPtato's task —— View job


PR Review: feat: read total slots header for serverless

Todo List:

  • Read repository guidelines (CLAUDE.md)
  • Analyze changed files for code quality
  • Check for potential bugs and issues
  • Review performance considerations
  • Assess security concerns
  • Evaluate test coverage needs
  • Provide comprehensive feedback

Review Summary

This PR implements support for reading the x-rivetkit-total-slots header in serverless mode, allowing dynamic configuration of slot capacity at runtime. The changes are well-structured and follow the existing codebase patterns.

🟢 Code Quality & Best Practices

Positive aspects:

  • Consistent parameter naming (totalSlots) across all components
  • Proper fallback handling with config.totalSlots as default
  • Follows existing patterns for header-based configuration (similar to x-rivet-token)
  • Type safety maintained with proper TypeScript annotations
  • Clean separation of concerns between client config, manager router, and actor driver

🟡 Minor Issues Found

  1. Type Coercion (packages/rivetkit/src/manager/router.ts:122):

    let totalSlots: number | undefined = parseInt(c.req.header("x-rivetkit-total-slots") as any);

    The as any cast violates the repo guideline: "Don't try to fix type issues by casting to unknown or any." Consider:

    const totalSlotsHeader = c.req.header("x-rivetkit-total-slots");
    let totalSlots: number | undefined = totalSlotsHeader ? parseInt(totalSlotsHeader) : undefined;
  2. Input Validation:
    The code only checks for isNaN() but doesn't validate if the parsed number is positive or within reasonable bounds. Consider adding:

    if (isNaN(totalSlots) || totalSlots <= 0) totalSlots = undefined;

🟢 Security Considerations

  • No security concerns identified
  • Header-based input is properly parsed and validated
  • No sensitive data exposure risks
  • Follows existing security patterns used for token handling

🟢 Performance Considerations

  • Minimal performance impact
  • Header parsing is lightweight
  • parseInt() call is acceptable for this use case
  • No memory leaks or performance bottlenecks introduced

🟡 Test Coverage Recommendations

Missing test scenarios that should be added:

  1. Header parsing tests:

    • Valid numeric values
    • Invalid/non-numeric values
    • Missing header (undefined case)
    • Negative numbers
    • Zero values
    • Very large numbers
  2. Integration tests:

    • Serverless endpoint with x-rivetkit-total-slots header
    • Fallback to config value when header is missing
    • Override behavior when both header and config are present

🟢 Architecture & Design

The implementation properly follows the existing architecture:

  • ClientConfigRunConfigEngineActorDriver flow is maintained
  • Serverless-specific handling isolated in router
  • Consistent with existing token parameter handling

Recommendations

  1. Fix type safety in header parsing (see issue Test #1 above)
  2. Add input validation for reasonable slot limits
  3. Add comprehensive tests for the new functionality
  4. Consider documenting the new header in API documentation

Files & Lines Referenced

  • packages/rivetkit/src/client/config.ts:22 - New totalSlots field
  • packages/rivetkit/src/drivers/engine/actor-driver.ts:96 - Priority logic for token/totalSlots
  • packages/rivetkit/src/manager/router.ts:108,122-123 - Header parsing and function signature update
  • packages/rivetkit/src/registry/mod.ts:219,225-226 - Serverless builder function update

Overall, this is a solid implementation that extends the existing patterns appropriately. The minor issues identified are easily addressable and don't block the functionality.


Copy link

claude bot commented Oct 1, 2025

Claude finished @MasterPtato's task —— View job


Code Review Complete ✅

Todo List:

  • Read repository guidelines (CLAUDE.md)
  • Analyze changed files for code quality
  • Check for potential bugs and issues
  • Review performance considerations
  • Assess security concerns
  • Evaluate test coverage needs
  • Provide comprehensive feedback

Review Summary

This PR implements support for reading the x-rivetkit-total-slots header in serverless mode, allowing dynamic configuration of slot capacity at runtime. The changes are well-structured and follow the existing codebase patterns.

🟢 Code Quality & Best Practices

Positive aspects:

  • Consistent parameter naming (totalSlots) across all components
  • Proper fallback handling with config.totalSlots as default
  • Follows existing patterns for header-based configuration (similar to x-rivet-token)
  • Type safety maintained with proper TypeScript annotations
  • Clean separation of concerns between client config, manager router, and actor driver

🟡 Minor Issues Found

  1. Type Coercion (Line 122 in router.ts):

    let totalSlots: number | undefined = parseInt(c.req.header("x-rivetkit-total-slots") as any);

    The as any cast is needed here because c.req.header() returns string | undefined, but it's not ideal. Consider:

    const totalSlotsHeader = c.req.header("x-rivetkit-total-slots");
    let totalSlots: number | undefined = totalSlotsHeader ? parseInt(totalSlotsHeader) : undefined;
  2. Input Validation:
    The code only checks for isNaN() but doesn't validate if the parsed number is positive or within reasonable bounds. Consider adding:

    if (isNaN(totalSlots) || totalSlots <= 0) totalSlots = undefined;

🟢 Security Considerations

  • No security concerns identified
  • Header-based input is properly parsed and validated
  • No sensitive data exposure risks
  • Follows existing security patterns used for token handling

🟢 Performance Considerations

  • Minimal performance impact
  • Header parsing is lightweight
  • parseInt() call is acceptable for this use case
  • No memory leaks or performance bottlenecks introduced

🟡 Test Coverage Recommendations

Missing test scenarios that should be added:

  1. Header parsing tests:

    • Valid numeric values
    • Invalid/non-numeric values
    • Missing header (undefined case)
    • Negative numbers
    • Zero values
    • Very large numbers
  2. Integration tests:

    • Serverless endpoint with x-rivetkit-total-slots header
    • Fallback to config value when header is missing
    • Override behavior when both header and config are present

🟢 Architecture & Design

The implementation properly follows the existing architecture:

  • ClientConfigRunConfigEngineActorDriver flow is maintained
  • Serverless-specific handling isolated in router
  • Consistent with existing token parameter handling

Recommendations

  1. Improve type safety in header parsing (see issue Test #1 above)
  2. Add input validation for reasonable slot limits
  3. Add comprehensive tests for the new functionality
  4. Consider documenting the new header in API documentation

Files & Lines Referenced

  • packages/rivetkit/src/client/config.ts:22 - New totalSlots field
  • packages/rivetkit/src/drivers/engine/actor-driver.ts:84,87 - Priority logic for token/totalSlots
  • packages/rivetkit/src/manager/router.ts:108,122-123 - Header parsing and function signature update
  • packages/rivetkit/src/registry/mod.ts:218,220-221 - Serverless builder function update

Overall, this is a solid implementation that extends the existing patterns appropriately. The minor issues identified are easily addressable and don't block the functionality.


@graphite-app graphite-app bot closed this Oct 1, 2025
@graphite-app graphite-app bot deleted the 09-30-feat_read_total_slots_header_for_serverless branch October 1, 2025 04:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants