Skip to content

Conversation

mcremon-meta
Copy link
Contributor

Summary: Now that the previous diff exists, we can add the int32 case back without adding to the code size of deployed models.

Differential Revision: D82282481

Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Sep 12, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/14269

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 4 New Failures

As of commit 1997822 with merge base ed0ab94 (image):

NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@meta-cla meta-cla bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Sep 12, 2025
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@mcremon-meta has exported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view the originating diff in D82282481.

Copy link

This PR needs a release notes: label

If your change should be included in the release notes (i.e. would users of this library care about this change?), please use a label starting with release notes:. This helps us keep track and include your important work in the next release notes.

To add a label, you can comment to pytorchbot, for example
@pytorchbot label "release notes: none"

For more information, see
https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/wiki/PyTorch-AutoLabel-Bot#why-categorize-for-release-notes-and-how-does-it-work.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@mcremon-meta has exported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view the originating diff in D82282481.

mcremon-meta added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 12, 2025
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: #14269

Now that the previous diff exists, we can add the int32 case back without adding to the code size of deployed models.

Differential Revision: D82282481
Matthias Cremon added 2 commits September 12, 2025 13:51
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: #14239

As titled, those operators are generic implementations of the custom ops we use, they're not reference implementations (in the numerical sense). Make the change to reflect that.

Differential Revision: D82231105

Reviewed By: ethansfng, hsharma35, DrJessop
Summary: As titled.

Differential Revision: D82319999
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@mcremon-meta has exported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view the originating diff in D82282481.

mcremon-meta added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 12, 2025
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: #14269

Now that the previous diff exists, we can add the int32 case back without adding to the code size of deployed models.

Reviewed By: hsharma35

Differential Revision: D82282481
Matthias Cremon and others added 2 commits September 12, 2025 16:28
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: #14268

As titled.

Differential Revision: D82183474

Reviewed By: hsharma35
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: #14269

Now that the previous diff exists, we can add the int32 case back without adding to the code size of deployed models.

Reviewed By: hsharma35

Differential Revision: D82282481
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@mcremon-meta has exported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view the originating diff in D82282481.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. fb-exported meta-exported
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants