Skip to content

Conversation

liferay-continuous-integration
Copy link
Member

@liferay-continuous-integration
Copy link
Member Author

To conserve resource, the PR Tester does not automatically run for the blacklisted sender 'liferay-continuous-integration'.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @liferay-continuous-integration, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request, automatically generated by liferay-continuous-integration, introduces a minor but significant clarification to the test.properties file. The primary purpose of this change is to update the instruction regarding the file's handling, shifting from a prohibition against editing to a prohibition against deletion, while still allowing for property overrides via a separate mechanism.

Highlights

  • Properties File Instruction Clarification: The instruction within the test.properties file has been updated from 'DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE.' to 'DO NOT DELETE THIS FILE.', providing a clearer directive on how the file should be managed.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request modifies a comment in the test.properties file. The change from 'DO NOT EDIT' to 'DO NOT DELETE' seems to reduce the clarity of the instruction for overriding properties. I've recommended reverting this change to maintain the original, more accurate guidance.

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
##
## DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE.
## DO NOT DELETE THIS FILE.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The previous instruction 'DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE' was clearer and more appropriate given the context. The lines that follow explain that users should create a separate file to overwrite properties, which implies this file should not be modified directly. Changing the instruction to 'DO NOT DELETE THIS FILE' might mislead users into thinking that editing the file is acceptable, which contradicts the intended configuration mechanism.

## DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE.

@liferay-continuous-integration
Copy link
Member Author

Build started.

Jenkins is currently running tests in the dummy test suite.

Base Branch:

Branch Name: master

Job Summary:

Job Link: test-portal-acceptance-pullrequest(master)

For more details click here.

@liferay-continuous-integration
Copy link
Member Author

relevant and stable testing have been bypassed because all modified files were excluded by the modified.files.global.excludes property in test.properties. The ci:test:relevant and ci:test:stable labels will match the ci:test:sf result.

@liferay-continuous-integration
Copy link
Member Author

✔️ ci:test:sf - 1 out of 1 jobs passed in 14 minutes

Ran com.liferay.source.formatter at released version 1.0.1544.
*The latest version has not been released.

Click here for more details.

Base Branch:

Branch Name: master
Branch GIT ID: 88175d6f657b94f7ec9c84c23db094335bee7a6c

Sender Branch:

Branch Name: master-temp-pr-1760564652250
Branch GIT ID: 8f10482d6ff399da5e025c027d8d7879793aa4eb

1 out of 1 jobs PASSED
1 Successful Jobs:
For more details click here.

@liferay-continuous-integration
Copy link
Member Author

Jenkins Report:jenkins-report.html
Jenkins Suite:sf
Pull Request:liferay#6645
Testray Routine:EE Pull Request
Testray Build ID:340463443

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant