-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.7k
Generated by liferay-continuous-integration #6645
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Generated by liferay-continuous-integration #6645
Conversation
To conserve resource, the PR Tester does not automatically run for the blacklisted sender 'liferay-continuous-integration'. |
Summary of ChangesHello @liferay-continuous-integration, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request, automatically generated by Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request modifies a comment in the test.properties
file. The change from 'DO NOT EDIT' to 'DO NOT DELETE' seems to reduce the clarity of the instruction for overriding properties. I've recommended reverting this change to maintain the original, more accurate guidance.
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ | |||
## | |||
## DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE. | |||
## DO NOT DELETE THIS FILE. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The previous instruction 'DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE' was clearer and more appropriate given the context. The lines that follow explain that users should create a separate file to overwrite properties, which implies this file should not be modified directly. Changing the instruction to 'DO NOT DELETE THIS FILE' might mislead users into thinking that editing the file is acceptable, which contradicts the intended configuration mechanism.
## DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE.
Build started.Jenkins is currently running tests in the Base Branch:Branch Name: master Job Summary:Job Link: test-portal-acceptance-pullrequest(master) For more details click here. |
|
✔️ ci:test:sf - 1 out of 1 jobs passed in 14 minutesRan com.liferay.source.formatter at released version 1.0.1544. Click here for more details.Base Branch:Branch Name: master Sender Branch:Branch Name: master-temp-pr-1760564652250 1 Successful Jobs:For more details click here. |
Jenkins Build:test-portal-source-format#937 Jenkins Report:jenkins-report.html Jenkins Suite:sf Pull Request:liferay#6645 Testray Routine:EE Pull Request Testray Build ID: 340463443 Testray Importer:test-portal-source-format#937 |
Sources: