Skip to content

Serverless Inference Solutions: Current Landscape and Limitations

inferx-net edited this page Mar 7, 2025 · 3 revisions

Several companies and platforms offer serverless inference solutions today, but they often work around GPU cold start limitations through compromises like pre-provisioning, warm pools, or hybrid approaches. Below is an overview of current offerings and their trade-offs:

1. Cloud Provider Offerings

AWS SageMaker Serverless Inference

  • Description: On-demand inference for PyTorch/TensorFlow models without server management.
  • Limitations:
    • GPU cold starts: 10–30 seconds.
    • Relies on pre-warmed instances, reducing true "serverless" benefits.

Google Cloud Vertex AI

  • Serverless Endpoints: Auto-scales GPU/TPU resources.
  • Limitations:
    • Uses pre-provisioned "minimum compute nodes" (idle during low traffic).
    • GPU support lags behind CPU/TPU optimization.

Microsoft Azure Functions + AI Services

  • Integration: Serverless functions triggered with preloaded models.
  • Limitations:
    • GPU workloads require dedicated instances (not fully serverless).

2. Specialized GPU Serverless Startups

Banana Dev

  • Focus: GPU inference for LLMs, diffusion models.
  • Approach: Pre-warms GPU instances in shared pools.
  • Trade-off: Model-specific pre-warming limits GPU utilization.

Lambda Labs

  • Serverless GPUs: On-demand NVIDIA GPUs with containers.
  • Limitation: Cold starts persist (~10–20 seconds for large models).

RunPod

  • Serverless Workers: GPU-powered containers.
  • Workaround: "Always-on" instances sacrifice cost efficiency.

Hugging Face Inference Endpoints

  • Serverless Option: Auto-scales GPUs for Hugging Face models.
  • Limitation: Bills for pre-warmed instances (per-second pricing).

3. Open-Source Frameworks (DIY FaaS)

  • Tools: Nuclio, Kubeless, OpenFaaS.
  • Use Case: Deploy GPU inference on Kubernetes.
  • Challenges:
    • Manual optimization required (e.g., GPU sharing).
    • Cold starts persist without warm-up scripts.

4. Workarounds and Hybrid Approaches

  • Pre-warmed Pools: Idle GPU instances kept warm (AWS, Banana Dev).
  • Model Streaming: Progressive weight loading (e.g., Run:ai Model Streamer).
  • Burst to CPU: Falls back to CPU during GPU cold starts (not viable for LLMs).

Key Limitations in Today’s Market

  1. Cold Start vs. Cost: True "pay-per-request" GPU serverless is rare.
  2. GPU Utilization: Stuck at 10–30% (vs. 80%+ for CPU FaaS).
  3. Large Model Support: Multi-GPU inference (e.g., 70B+ LLMs) lacks serverless options.

Is It Truly Serverless?

Most platforms are serverless in name only:

  • Mask cold starts via pre-provisioning.
  • Bill for idle resources (warm pools), limiting cost efficiency.

The Bottom Line

While inference FaaS solutions exist, they rely on compromises:

  • Pre-warmed instances.
  • Hybrid scaling.
  • Limited large-model support.

True serverless GPU inference awaits breakthroughs in:

  • Lightweight frameworks (e.g., faster vLLM initialization).
  • Hardware-level GPU context caching.
  • Parallelized model/framework loading.
Clone this wiki locally