-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Admin filter factory #9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
""" WalkthroughA new pattern for creating Django admin filters is introduced. The README adds documentation on using a new Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Admin as Django Admin
participant User as Admin User
participant Filter as ChoiceListFilter
participant Queryset as Queryset
User->>Admin: Selects filter value in admin
Admin->>Filter: Calls queryset(request, queryset)
Filter->>Filter: Looks up filter key in choices
Filter->>Queryset: Applies Q expression if key found
Queryset-->>Admin: Returns filtered queryset
Admin-->>User: Displays filtered results
Poem
""" 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (6)
django_adminlink/admin.py (1)
184-187
: Consider improving the verbose name normalization.The current implementation capitalizes only the first letter, which may not produce optimal results for multi-word parameter names.
Consider using title case for better formatting:
- if verbose_name is None: - verbose_name = default_verbose_name.capitalize() + if verbose_name is None: + verbose_name = default_verbose_name.title()This would convert
"archive_status"
to"Archive Status"
instead of"Archive status"
.README.md (5)
120-121
: Fix grammar error.The sentence contains a grammatical error that affects readability.
Apply this diff to fix the grammar:
-Django allows to add extra filters on the Django admin, but even with a `SimpleListFilter`, there are cumbersome to make. We define a `ChoiceListFilter` which can be +Django allows to add extra filters on the Django admin, but even with a `SimpleListFilter`, they are cumbersome to make. We define a `ChoiceListFilter` which can be
125-136
: Fix import typo and add language specification to code block.There's a typo in the import statement and the code block should specify Python as the language.
Apply this diff to fix the issues:
-``` +```python from django.db.models import Q -from django.db.modles.functions import Now +from django.db.models.functions import Now
138-138
: Fix spelling error.There's a spelling error that affects readability.
Apply this diff to fix the spelling:
-so a dictionary that maps the key of the filter on a 2-tuple with the verbose name as first item, and the Django filter (a `Q` object) as second one. Because it is a dictionary, it is also imppsible to specify the same key twice. +so a dictionary that maps the key of the filter on a 2-tuple with the verbose name as first item, and the Django filter (a `Q` object) as second one. Because it is a dictionary, it is also impossible to specify the same key twice.
143-149
: Add language specification to code block.The code block should specify Python as the language for proper syntax highlighting.
Apply this diff to add language specification:
-``` +```python ARCHIVE_OPTIONS = [
129-135
: Verify the example syntax consistency.The example shows the
ChoiceListFilter
class usage but there are some syntax issues in the dictionary definition that should be addressed for clarity.Apply this diff to fix the dictionary syntax:
choices = { - 'active': ('Active', ~Q(archived_at__lte=Now())) - 'archived': ('Archived', Q(archived_at__lte=Now())) + 'active': ('Active', ~Q(archived_at__lte=Now())), + 'archived': ('Archived', Q(archived_at__lte=Now())) }The missing comma after the first tuple could cause confusion for readers copying the example.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
README.md
(1 hunks)django_adminlink/admin.py
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md
[grammar] ~120-~120: Ensure spelling is correct
Context: ...in, but even with a SimpleListFilter
, there are cumbersome to make. We define a `Ch...
(QB_NEW_EN_ORTHOGRAPHY_ERROR_IDS_1)
[grammar] ~138-~138: Ensure spelling is correct
Context: ... Because it is a dictionary, it is also imppsible to specify the same key twice. We can ...
(QB_NEW_EN_ORTHOGRAPHY_ERROR_IDS_1)
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
README.md
125-125: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
143-143: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
🪛 Ruff (0.12.2)
django_adminlink/admin.py
189-189: SyntaxError: Expected an identifier, but found a keyword 'for' that cannot be used here
189-189: SyntaxError: Expected 'in', found name
189-189: SyntaxError: Expected '}', found ','
189-189: SyntaxError: Comparison expression cannot be used here
189-189: SyntaxError: Expected a statement
189-190: SyntaxError: Expected a statement
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: test (3.8)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
django_adminlink/admin.py (1)
167-181
: LGTM! Well-designed filter pattern.The
ChoiceListFilter
class provides a clean abstraction for Django admin filters with predefined choices. The implementation correctly:
- Uses a dictionary mapping keys to tuples of display labels and Q objects
- Extracts display labels for the
lookups
method- Applies the appropriate filter condition in the
queryset
method- Handles missing values gracefully
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation