Skip to content

feat: support eval reason for openfeature, wasm events #96

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jul 30, 2025
Merged

feat: support eval reason for openfeature, wasm events #96

merged 6 commits into from
Jul 30, 2025

Conversation

phaym
Copy link
Contributor

@phaym phaym commented Jul 28, 2025 •
edited
Loading

  • updated wasm bucketing to 1.41.0
  • handle cloud/local bucketing for OF with eval
  • pass eval reason metadata to event produced if client not initialized

Closes COR-3470

@phaym phaym changed the title update wasm for eval events, set flagMetadata for openfeature feat: support eval reason for openfeature, wasm events Jul 28, 2025
@phaym phaym force-pushed the feat/openfeature-eval-reasons branch from 9058226 to 67d1ccb Compare July 29, 2025 13:21
Base automatically changed from feat/eval-reasons to main July 29, 2025 20:18
@phaym phaym force-pushed the feat/openfeature-eval-reasons branch from 67d1ccb to be8812f Compare July 29, 2025 20:18
@phaym phaym marked this pull request as ready for review July 29, 2025 20:27
@phaym phaym requested a review from a team as a code owner July 29, 2025 20:27
kaushalkapasi
kaushalkapasi reviewed Jul 30, 2025
View reviewed changes
@phaym phaym merged commit 73260ac into main Jul 30, 2025
12 checks passed
@phaym phaym deleted the feat/openfeature-eval-reasons branch July 30, 2025 13:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@kaushalkapasi kaushalkapasi kaushalkapasi approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@phaym @kaushalkapasi