Skip to content

Suggestion to remove standard_llh #374

@pernicet

Description

@pernicet

I have been using Jannis Flaires catalogue to calculate its sensitivity:

  • dataset: ps_v004_p02
  • minimisation handler: fixed_weights
  • weight: bolometric fluence
  • 528 sources
  • Gamma = 2

The two likelihoods tested are:

  1. standard_llh
  2. standard_matrix

The n_s bias plots look like:

standard_llh
bias_n_s-25.pdf
standard_matrix
bias_n_s-26.pdf

Similar behaviour appears in the gamma bias plots. I also tested sub catalogues of Flaires with 100, 200, 300 and 400 sources and the behaviour it's the same: a huge deviation is observed when using the standard_llh (even with fewer sources), which it seems to disappear when using standard_matrix. Do we know why? Should we perhaps reconsider using standard_llh at all?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions