-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
Open
Description
I have been using Jannis Flaires catalogue to calculate its sensitivity:
- dataset: ps_v004_p02
- minimisation handler: fixed_weights
- weight: bolometric fluence
- 528 sources
- Gamma = 2
The two likelihoods tested are:
standard_llh
standard_matrix
The n_s bias plots look like:
standard_llh
bias_n_s-25.pdf
standard_matrix
bias_n_s-26.pdf
Similar behaviour appears in the gamma bias plots. I also tested sub catalogues of Flaires with 100, 200, 300 and 400 sources and the behaviour it's the same: a huge deviation is observed when using the standard_llh
(even with fewer sources), which it seems to disappear when using standard_matrix
. Do we know why? Should we perhaps reconsider using standard_llh
at all?
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels