Fix multiple-chain method ambiguity

[penelopeysm]

TuringLang/DynamicPPL.jl#1035 introduces a method ambiguity with a stray method in Turing.

This PR removes that method.

[github-actions]

Turing.jl documentation for PR #2670 is available at:
https://TuringLang.github.io/Turing.jl/previews/PR2670/

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 85.86%. Comparing base (0a6a10b) to head (97ec233).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2670      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   85.70%   85.86%   +0.15%     
==========================================
  Files          22       22              
  Lines        1434     1429       -5     
==========================================
- Hits         1229     1227       -2     
+ Misses        205      202       -3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 17555845014

Details

• 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
• No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
• Overall coverage increased (+0.2%) to 83.719%

---

Totals
Change from base Build 17249540955:	0.2%
Covered Lines:	1193
Relevant Lines:	1425

---

💛 - Coveralls

[seabbs]

Is there a change to make here or to make an issue for to avoid this in the future?

[penelopeysm]

Honestly no, it's just that resume_from was broken for multiple chains and I fixed it, and in the process of fixing it there was this incompatibility between latest DynamicPPL and latest Turing over the weekend. This isn't reflective of any larger underlying problem imo

[penelopeysm]

I guess there is a larger problem that the codebase is not perfect, but that's my full-time job so I can't snap a finger and fix it ;)

[seabbs]

I was wondering if there was any CI checking that could be setup for downstream deps or anything like that.